Legal Opinion

Anderson v. United States

District Court, D. Maine

Decided August 4, 2008No. CV-07-35-B-WPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., District Judge.

In an action tried before the Court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the Court finds that Dale and Penny Anderson failed to demonstrate that Dr. Michael Lis-anti, a general surgeon employed by the Department of Veterans Affairs, committed medical malpractice in performing la-paroscopic gallbladder surgery on August 27, 2004, and grants judgment in favor of Defendant United States of America.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

A.j A Good Citizen

As a veteran, husband, father, and good citizen, Dale Anderson does not deserve to be so unlucky. A native…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Richard and Sandra Finchum v. Ford Motor Company and Kia Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Downer v. VeilleuxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. Cyr v. GiesenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  4. Cox v. Dela CruzSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. Caron v. PrattSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API