Legal Opinion
Ute Water Conservancy District v. City of Grand Junction
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 21, 1993No. 92CA2026PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge NEY.
Defendant, City of Grand Junction (city), appeals the judgment of the trial court entered in favor of plaintiff, Ute Water Conservancy District (district). Plaintiff cross-appeals that judgment. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and dismiss the appeal in part.
The district was formed in 1956 to supply water to certain unincorporated areas of Mesa County. At that time, the city was surrounded by the district, but there was no overlap of the city’s and the district’s boundaries.
This lack of overlap ended when the city annexed territory within the boundaries of the district.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jennings Water, Inc. v. City of North Vernon, Indiana, and Csl Utilities, Inc., and Csl Community Association, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- City of Virginia v. Northland Office Properties Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- City of Madison v. Bear Creek Water Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Pinehurst Enterprises, Inc. v. Town of Southern PinesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
- Jennings Water, Inc. v. City of North Vernon, Ind.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Grand Junction v. Ute Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995