Legal Opinion

Bowles v. W. T. Grant Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 28, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

The defendant, W. T. Grant Co., moves for a summary judgment dismissing the complaint and vacating a temporary injunction heretofore issued herein.

On August 8, 1943, the OPA filed separate complaints and obtained orders to show cause containing temporary restraining provisions against four of the larger low-price variety retail chain stores — W. T. Grant Co., McCrory Stores, J. C. Penney Company and J. J. Newberry Company. In each case the complaint charged the defendant with selling goods above the maximum prices allowed by Maximum Price Regulation 330. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Bowles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  4. Henderson v. BurdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Brown v. Hecht Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowles v. McCrady Const. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Porter v. BermanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API