Legal Opinion

City Of Puyallup, V. Pierce County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 14, 2021No. 54474-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two December 14, 2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II CITY OF PUYALLUP, No. 54474-1-II Appellant, v. PIERCE COUNTY, a Washington PUBLISHED OPINION governmental unit; KNUTSON FARMS, INC.; and RUNNING BEAR DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, Respondents. VELJACIC, J. — Pierce County issued a mitigated determination of nonsignificance (MDNS) under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for a warehouse distribution project bordering the City of Puyallup. Puyallup attempted to assume lead agency status so it could issue a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Klickitat County Citizens Against Imported Waste v. Klickitat CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City Of Puyallup, V Pierce County,et AlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API