Legal Opinion

City Of Puyallup, V Pierce County,et Al

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 3, 2019No. 51501-6PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two April 3, 2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II CITY OF PUYALLUP, a Washington No. 51501-6-II municipal corporation, Appellant, v. PIERCE COUNTY, a Washington PUBLISHED OPINION Governmental Unit; KNUTSTON FARMS, INC. and RUNNING BEAR DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, Respondents. JOHANSON, J.P.T.* — The City of Puyallup appeals a superior court’s summary judgment dismissal of its complaint in this land use action. The superior court granted the Respondents’1 motion to dismiss, ruling that the City did not have…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Jametsky v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. In Re Detention of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City Of Puyallup, V. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  2. City Of Puyallup, V. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  3. Protective Admin Services, Inc., V. Department Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API