Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Second Injury Fund

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1985No. C-3617PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Justice.

The question presented for review is whether the Second Injury Fund is subro-*108gated to the rights of Walter Johnson in his personal injury suit against a third party. The trial court denied subrogation. The court of appeals reversed and remanded, with one judge dissenting. 678 S.W.2d 225. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In the course of his employment, Walter Johnson suffered an injury resulting in the loss of vision in his left eye. He had previously lost the vision in his right eye. The cumulative effect of the two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. Mauritz-Wells Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bryan v. SundbergTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  3. County of Harris v. CrookerTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Second Injury Fund v. KeatonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Texas Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Employers Casualty Co. v. Dyess, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  3. Stolhandske v. Stern, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  4. Texas Ass'n of School Boards, Inc. v. Ward, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  5. Harlingen Family Dentistry, P.C. v. Texas Health & Human Services CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API