Legal Opinion

Siple v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 24, 1984No. 55,703PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

The Siples, plaintiffs, brought this action in tort for damages to plaintiffs’ car, premised on the duty owed by the City of Topeka, defendant, to inspect and remove an allegedly defective tree. Defendant claimed it was exempted from tort liability by the Kansas Tort Claims Act. In a trial to the court, judgment was granted in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

On June 21, 1981, the Siples were returning to their home in Topeka from an overnight camping trip in their five-week-old Chevrolet Chevette. The Siples parked their Chevette in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Mead v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Turner v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lindenman v. UmscheidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. Prager v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Gooch v. Bethel A.M.E. ChurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Schlobohm v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Bailey v. KenneyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API