Legal Opinion

Turner v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1934No. 31,675PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action for damages.

The petition alleged that the city of Wichita failed to use reasonable diligence to ascertain whether trees in and along its streets were safe and to remove decayed and dead branches thereof liable to fall upon travelers in the street, and that on October 18, 1932, about 10 p. m., plaintiff's son, while proceeding eastward on the sidewalk on the north side of Murdock avenue, just east of its intersection with Lawrence avenue, was struck by a falling limb from a *776tree located in the street slightly north of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atkinson ex rel. Atkinson v. Wichita Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. City of Atchison v. JansenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  3. Briggs v. SheplerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Dunham v. BokelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Rogers v. City of CoffeyVilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grantham v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Brown v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. State v. LeighSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Randle v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Siple v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API