Legal Opinion

Crowe v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 1880PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The appeal in this case was taken from a decree of the Court below making perpetual an injunction previously issued, restraining the appellant from tearing down the building- erected upon the lot in the proceedings men- ■ tioned. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBryan, J.

The appellant is possessed of a leasehold interest in a lot of ground in the City of Baltimore, which by the terms of the original lease was demised for ninety-nine years, with a covenant for perpetual renewal. The appellee is seized of the reversion in fee. A bill in equity was filed, by the appellee to restrain the appellant from tearing down and removing from the lot a certain dwelling-house which had been erected thereon; and it was alleged in the bill of complaint that if the dwelling-house should be torn down and removed, the reversioner’s security for the rent reserved on the lease…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dugan v. GittingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
  2. Warren v. TwilleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
  3. Warfield v. GambrillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1829
  4. Briesch v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. J. W. Perry Co. v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Camden Trust Co. v. HandleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  3. Potomac Edison Co. v. RoutzahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. Putzel v. Drovers & Mechanics' National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  5. de la Haba v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API