Legal Opinion

Camden Trust Co. v. Handle

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 25, 1942PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

Unless it constitutes a breach of duty arising out of contract, the unassuming grantee of mortgaged lands is not liable to the mortgagee for permissive waste, even though the mortgage security is thereby rendered insufficient.

Such liability is unknown to the common law; and in this state it has not been imposed by statute. Waste at common law “is a spoil or destruction in houses, gardens, trees or other corporeal hereditaments, to the disherison of him that hath the remainder or reversion in fee simple or fee-tail.” 2 Blacks. Com. 281. By the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Delano v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Hutchins v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  3. Crowe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  4. Young v. HavilandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Wilds v. LaytonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1822

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. The Travelers Insurance Company v. 633 Third AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. In Re Application of BusseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Finley v. ChainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. City of Newark v. Central & Lafayette Realty Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Hutchings v. SternbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API