Legal Opinion

Putzel v. Drovers & Mechanics' National Bank

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 1894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from tbe Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The appeal in this case was taken from a decree of the lower Court, (Dennis, J.,) dissolving the injunction previously issued, and dismissing the bill of complaint. The case is stated in the opinion of this Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBryan, J.

Selig G. Putzel filed a bill in equity against the Drovers and Mechanics’ National Bank of Baltimore. It was-alleged that the defendant, without right or justification was about to tear down the rear wall of the complainant’s dwelling-house, and thereby render it untenantable and do him irreparable damage. The bill prayed an injunction to restrain the defendant from proceeding as-alleged, and it was accordingly granted before answer. There was also a prayer for general relief. After answer the defendant moved a dissolution of the injunction. Testimony was taken on both sides, and when the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glenn v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  2. Crowe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mary Jane Stevens Co. v. First Nat. Bldg. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Barry v. EdlavitchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  3. Carrigg v. Mechanics Bank of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Bright v. Bacon & SonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  5. McLane v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API