Legal Opinion
General Shoe Corporation v. Rosen
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1940No. 4581PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
The General Shoe Corporation, plaintiff in the District Court, brought this suit against Isadore Rosen to protect its trade marks, “Friendly” and “The Friendly Five”, as applied to shoes. The plaintiff is a Tennessee corporation which in 1925 took over the business of the Jarman Shoe Company, a copartnership engaged in the manufacture of shoes, under whose name the marketing of the product has since been continued. The defendant is a resident of Charleston, West Virginia, where he owns and operates three retail men’s furnishing stores on the same street. He began business…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- The Vision Center, Cross v. Opticks, Inc., Will Ross, Inc. And G. D. Searle & Co., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Carmen A. TortoraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Dana I. Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Surgicenters of America, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. Medical Dental Surgeries, Co., an Oregon Corporation Dba Medical Dental SurgicentersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.