Legal Opinion
Rush Creek Solutions, Inc. v. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 12, 2004No. 03CA0517PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
In this contract dispute involving the sovereign immunity of a federally recognized Indian tribe, defendant, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff, Rush Creek Solutions, Inc. We deny Rush Creek’s motion to dismiss this appeal, affirm the trial court’s order, and remand for further proceedings.
Rush Creek and the Tribe signed a contract in which Rush Creek agreed to provide the Tribe computer software and maintenance support. The Tribe’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) signed the contract on its…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Johnson v. FankellSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Memphis Biofuels, LLC v. Chickasaw Nation Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Barnett v. Elite Properties of America, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- CASH ADVANCE & PREF. CASH LOANS v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Park Rise Homeowners Ass'n v. Resource Construction Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.