Commonwealth v. Socci
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunther, J.,
Defendant was tried and convicted of larceny. Sentence was imposed and motions for a new trial were refused by the court below. Defendant complains of the admission into evidence of his prior conviction of a felony and the manner of its introduction.
The defendant took the stand in his own behalf and denied any connection with the crime charged. For the purpose of impeaching his credibility the Commonwealth introduced the record of a prior conviction. This is an approved method of attacking credibility: Commonwealth v. Gibbs, 167 Pa. Superior Ct. 79, 74 A. 2d 750.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PalarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Commonwealth v. WiswesserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. GibbsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Commonwealth v. ArcurioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RobsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. HassineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. FINKELSTEINSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Vendetti AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.