Legal Opinion

Bardshar v. Seattle Electric Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1913No. 10796PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered June 27,1912, dismissing an action in tort, upon granting a nonsuit.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Appellant seeks to recover for damages to his automobile, resulting from a collision with one of respondent’s street cars at First avenue and Union street, Seattle, about 8: SO p. m. September IS, 1910, and takes this appeal from a judgment of nonsuit, based upon the contributory negligence of the chauffeur.

The automobile was proceeding south on First avenue from Pike street, approaching Union street, one block to ¡the south; it was passed by one of respondent’s cars on the west or south-bound track. This south-bound car stopped on the south side of Union street to take on awaiting…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Helliesen v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Dimuria v. Seattle Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Terien v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Christensen v. Union Trunk LineWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Skinner v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Herrett v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Golay v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Coons v. Olympia Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Johannessen v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Roanoke Railway & Electric Co. v. LovingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API