Legal Opinion

Terien v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 21, 1897No. Nos 10,840-(190)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Action in tbe district court for Ramsey county to recover $6,500 for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff. From an order, Brill, J., denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding a verdict of $1,000 for plaintiff or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

Plaintiff, a pedestrian, while crossing the street, was struck by defendant’s street-railway electric car, and injured. This action is brought to recover damages for the alleged negligence of defendant resulting in such injury. On the trial, plaintiff had a verdict, and from an order denying a new trial defendant appeals.

In our opinion, the evidence will sustain a finding that defendant was guilty of negligence which caused or contributed to the injury, and the only other question that we deem it necessary to consider is whether or not the evidence of plaintiff’s contributory negligence in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watson v. Minneapolis Street-Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Hickey v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Helliesen v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Ames v. Waterloo & Cedar Falls Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Ward v. Marshalltown Light, Power & Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Stallman v. SheaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Bremer v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API