Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Commanding Officer

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 14, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 70-2323PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

In this combined habeas corpus and mandamus proceeding, petitioner seeks to review his call to active duty in the United States Army. He was called to active duty for a period of two years in an enlisted grade as a result of his disenrollment from ROTC for willful violation of his ROTC contract. Petitioner’s basic claim is that he was denied due process of law in that the military personnel processing his case at various stages of the proceedings failed to assist him in processing a request for a conscientious objector discharge as was required by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hammond v. LenfestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. United States ex rel. Brooks v. CliffordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. George Anderson Bowen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. William E. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Timothy Shawn BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perez v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  2. Rankin v. ChristianDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API