Casualty Co. v. . Comrs. of Saluda
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
From early times in this State, and generally elsewhere, mandamus has been recognized as a proper proceeding to compel a levy of tax to pay a judgment against a municipality. Gooch v. Gregory, 65 N. C., 142; Lutterloh v. Comrs., 65 N. C., 403; Allen v. Drainage Comrs., 175 N. C., 190, 95 S. E., 170.
In fact, it is often the only remedy, since the property of a municipality necessary to carry on government is not subject to execution. Hardware Co. v. Schools, 151 N. C., 507, 66 S. E., 583; Brockenbrough v. Comrs., 134 N. C., 1, 46 S. E., 28; Weber v. Lee County, 73 U. S., 210, 18 L. Ed., 781.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Person v. . WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Thompson v. Allen CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Brockenbrough v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- City of Chicago v. HasleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
- City of Hickory v. Catawba CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hamlet Hospital v. Joint Committee on StandardizationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Sutton v. FiggattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Town of Graham v. Karpark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Estate of DeBow v. City of East St. LouisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Champion v. Vance County Board of HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.