Legal Opinion
Hadrych v. Hadrych
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 4, 2006No. 25,456PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} In this divorce case, Husband appeals an order awarding Wife a money judgment in the amount of her share of Husband’s military retirement benefits. Husband effected a significant reduction to Wife’s share of the benefits when he converted his benefits to 100% disability payments and waived further retirement benefits. We addressed this issue in Scheidel v. Scheidel, 2000-NMCA-059, 129 N.M. 223, 4 P.3d 670. There, we relied in part on language in a marital settlement agreement (MSA) and held that an ex-spouse may not reduce the other party’s share of military…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Johnson v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Fernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Ruggles v. RugglesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Black v. BlackSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stone v. StoneCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Weise v. Washington Tru Solutions, L.L.C.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Megee v. CarmineMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Humphries v. PAY AND SAVE, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Humphries v. PAY AND SAVE, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.