Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2001PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HolderHolder, J.

in which ANDERSON, C.J., and DROWOTA, BIRCH, and BARKER, JJ., joined.

The parties’ marital dissolution agreement (“MDA”) divided Mr. Johnson’s “mil itary retirement benefits” to provide one half of those benefits to Ms. Johnson. After the final decree was entered, Mr. Johnson unilaterally waived a portion of his military retired pay to receive the same amount in non-taxable disability benefits. The payment of Ms. Johnson’s share of the military retired pay was reduced accordingly. Ms. Johnson requested a modification of the MDA to provide for alimony in an amount equal to the reduction.…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Farmers-Peoples Bank v. ClemmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Nutt v. Champion International Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by129 opinions

  1. Southern Constructors, Inc. v. Loudon County Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Planters Gin Co. v. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Maggart v. Almany Realtors, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Barnes v. BarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Staubach Retail Services-Southeast, LLC v. H.G. Hill Realty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API