People ex rel. Broderick v. Goldfogle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Dowling, J.:
As the constitutionality of chapter 897 of the Laws of 1923, amending the Tax Law and known as the Moneyed Capital Tax Law, is attacked by the relators, respondents, in this and the two following cases, it is requisite that this question should be dealt with at the outset, before considering the state of facts in each particular case which is claimed to justify the imposition of the tax provided by that statute.
The legislation is the result of the decision in the case of People ex rel. Hanover National Bank v. Goldfogle (234 N. Y. 345), rendered in 1922. (Motion for reargument…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Olp v. Town of BrightonNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of AdamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- Maxwell v. KlaessNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- In re RaskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- People ex rel. Benkard v. GoldfogleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.