Legal Opinion
In re Raskin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 6, 1946PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The facts in this case are stipulated.
The employer is now, and during the time involved in this controversy, has been, engaged in the operation of a beauty parlor. She employs operators who perform personal service on female customers in connection with the care, treatment and adornment of the hair, nails or skin and for the enhancement of their personal appearance.
It is conceded that tip's or gratuities amounting to 10% of their wages were received from the patrons by these employees in the course of their duties, which the employer permitted them to accept. The employer has never paid…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Trustees of the Village of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Claim of Sloat v. Rochester Taxicab Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- In re International Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Bronx Gas & Electric Co. v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Matter of Sloate v. . Rochester Taxicab CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Estate of AltstedterNew York Surrogate's Court · 2013