Legal Opinion

Harris v. Wright

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 27, 1932No. 8 Div. 267PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The action is under our homicide statute (Code 1923, § 5696), with verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant admitted the killing, and sought to justify upon his plea of self-defense, upon which issue the evidence was conflicting. In such a plea all the elements of self-defense should appear (Drummond v. Drummond, 212 Ala. 242, 102 So. 112), including that of defendant’s freedom from fault (Wilhite v. Fricke, 169 Ala. 76, 53 So. 157).

Assignments of error 5 and 6 as to rulings on demurrers to pleas 2 and 3 are not well taken. Moreover, it appears these pleas originally contained such…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. CockrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. People v. RigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Higman v. CamodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McLaney v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Pollard v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Lee v. MacOn County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Ex Parte Cincinnati Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Montgomery v. Herring (In Re Herring)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API