Legal Opinion

Patanska v. Kuznia

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 20, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The determination of the main question presented depends upon the nature of the legacies bequeathed by the third clause of the will — whether they were intended to be specific legacies, confined to the testator's savings accounts, or general or demonstrative legacies of definite sums of money which, at the time of the execution of the will, happened to be in banks.

In determining the question, consideration must be given to the whole will; to the circumstances under which it was prepared and executed; to the situation in which the testator then was as regards his property; to the relation and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prendergast v. WalshNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899
  2. Case v. HasseNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
  3. Mecum v. StoughtonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  4. Lippincott v. WikoffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1895
  5. Blair v. ScribnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RogersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Hastings College v. ReesNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. In Re the Estates of DoepkeWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. In Re the Trust Estate Created by WeillHawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  5. The Hackensack Trust Co. v. BogertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API