John Hancock Property & Casualty Insurance Companies v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.
Defendant appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting summary disposition to plaintiff. The trial court concluded as a matter of law that defendant was primarily liable for the medical expenses incurred by an insured party following an automobile accident. We affirm.
The insured party, Anna Heinsman, was injured in an automobile accident in November of 1985. At the time, Heinsman was insured under a no-fault insurance policy issued by plaintiff and a group health insurance policy issued by defendant. Following the accident, plaintiff paid Heinsman’s medical expenses pursuant to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Kemper Insurance v. Health Insurance Administration, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Petovello v. MurrayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jones v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Allstate Insurance v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walters v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- JOHN HANCOCK PROPERTY AND CAS. INS. CO. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1991