Legal Opinion

JOHN HANCOCK PROPERTY AND CAS. INS. CO. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1991No. Docket Nos. 87342, 89534, (Calendar Nos. 11-12)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

In Federal Kemper Ins Co, Inc v Health Ins Administration, Inc, 424 Mich 537; 383 NW2d 590 (1986), this Court held that where a person incurs medical expense as a result of an automobile accident and is covered by both automobile no-fault insurance and basic, comprehensive health insurance, the health insurer is primarily liable for the payment of the medical expense if the automobile insurance was coordinated with the health insurance pursuant to § 3109a of the no-fault act.

In the instant cases, in contrast with Kemper, the health insurers did not provide basic, comprehensive, health care…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Kemper Insurance v. Health Insurance Administration, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Lewis v. TRANSAMERICA INS. CORPORATION OF AMERICAMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Employers Mutual Insurance Companies v. American Community Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. John Hancock Property & Casualty Insurance Companies v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rettig v. Hastings Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. American Community Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. American Community Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Allstate Insurance v. Health Alliance PlanMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Joseph Canty v. Michael Chester MasonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API