Legal Opinion

Brumark Corp. v. Corporation Commission

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 16, 1996No. 86354PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Presiding Judge:

Appellant, Brumark Corporation (“Brumark”), seeks review of Order No. 895331 of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (“the Commission”). This Order is the culmination of hearings before the Commission in Causes numbered CD-900154020 (“154020”), 900154084 (“154084”), and 940000948 (“948”). Causes 154020 (Brumark’s Application) and 154084 (Santa Fe’s First Application) were the subject of a prior order of the Commission, Order No. 359695, which was appealed by Brumark in Brumark Corporation v. Corporation Commission, 864 P.2d 1287 (Okla. App.1993) (“Brumark I ”).…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Wilson v. KaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Mobbs v. City of LehighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Fent v. Oklahoma Nat. Gas, a Div. of OneokSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Willis v. Nowata Land and Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. City of TulsaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2018
  2. Choate v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. Bell v. State ex rel. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Grennan v. Bonray DrillingCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Ray v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API