Legal Opinion
Rudginski v. Pullella
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided September 6, 1977PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIE, Judge.
A & H Plumbing and Heating, Inc. (defendant and third party defendant) has moved to dismiss the complaint filed by Stanley A. Rodginski and Sieglinde P. Rod-ginski (intervening plaintiffs). The motion is based on the three year statute of limitations found in 10 Del.C. § 8106. It is undisputed that the cited statute is the statute setting the time limit within which the claim here asserted may be brought. The dispute is as to the date upon which the action accrued and the statutory period started to run under the peculiar facts of this case.
The facts are essentially…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Chrischilles v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Isaacson, Stolper & Co. v. Artisan's Savings BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Company v. SpinelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- David B. Lilly Co. v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Ontario Hydro v. Zallea Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
- Kaufman v. C.L. McCabe & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Pack & Process, Inc. v. Celotex Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.