Legal Opinion
Wirth & Hamid Fair Booking, Inc. v. Wirth
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 3, 1934PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
As part of a contract for the sale of the stock of Wirth & Hamid Fair Booking, Inc., the defendant Frank Wirth agreed that for the term of seven years he Would not engage within a specified territory in “ the booking and /or supplying of theatrical artists and/or entertainers of any kind or character, whose services are to be performed in any fair, park, celebration, pier, carnival, circus (except as hereinafter provided) style show or pageant, fireworks at parks and/or fairs, auto races at parks and/or fairs, or any of them * * The purpose of the restrictive clause was to prevent Frank…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Seidlitz v. . AuerbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Lynch v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Ropes v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Hackenheimer v. . KurtzmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by75 opinions
- Truck Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Puritan Farms 2nd, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Purchasing Associates, Inc. v. WeitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Equitable Lumber Corp. v. IPA Land Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Fifty States Management Corp. v. Pioneer Auto Parks, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Karpinski v. IngrasciNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.