State v. Viering
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from the judgment after being convicted of selling intoxicating liquor.
The information charges the unlawful sale of “one pint of intoxicating liquor, commonly called moonshine alcohol.” The testimony described the liqúor purchased as “moonshine whisky.” The term “moonshine” merely characterizes the liquor as of secret origin, a term formerly used to denote unlawful manufacture and by reason thereof presumably made at night. The claim is that there is a variance between the pleading and the proof.
The gist of the alleged offense is the sale of intoxicating liquor. Defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GoldstoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- State v. LautenschlagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Yoather v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Winston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Territory of Hawaii v. CoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1947
- Everhart v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. ShannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929