Legal Opinion
United States v. Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 20, 2003No. 02-1503PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
The government appeals from the district court’s 1 order granting the Santee Sioux Tribe (the Tribe) relief from a prior order of contempt. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
This is our third review of this case, which has an extensive factual and procedural history. In early 1993, the Tribe attempted to negotiate a compact with the State of Nebraska that would have permitted class III gaming on tribal lands, pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. (IGRA). No agreement was reached, but the Tribe nevertheless opened a class III gambling casino on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Larry T. Tadlock, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Donald E. Powell, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. 162 MegaMania Gambling DevicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. Louis Effort For AIDS v. John HuffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Seneca-Cayuga Tribe v. National Indian Gaming CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Ingmar Eloy GillonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Michigan Gambling Opposition (MichGO) v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- United States v. Ingmar GillonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003