Legal Opinion

St. Louis Effort For AIDS v. John Huff

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 10, 2015No. 14-1520PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Chief Judge.

St. Louis Effort for AIDS, Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region and Southwest Missouri (Planned Parenthood) (collectively, appellees), and a number of other individuals and entities brought this facial challenge to Missouri’s Health Insurance Marketplace Innovation Act (HI-MIA), Mo.Rev.Stat. § 376.2000 et seq. The plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction, claiming certain portions of the HI-MIA are preempted by federal law, violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution,, and are void for vagueness under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Griffioen v. Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. Jason Powell v. Larry NobleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  3. Dakotans for Health v. Kristi NoemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  4. Del Grosso v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  5. Progressive Technologies Inc. v. Chaffin Holdings Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API