Legal Opinion
Coles v. Perry
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 25, 2003No. Civil Action 01-732(JMF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
I herein resolve defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be denied in part and granted in part.
STATEMENT OF FACTS NOT IN DISPUTE
1. On July 29, 1991, Karen A. Coles (“plaintiff’), began working as a Criminal Investigator GS-1811-13 or Grade 18 Special Agent, in the Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) of the General Services Administration (“GSA” or “defendant”). Plaintiff was assigned to defendant’s headquarters in Washington, D.C. and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gipson v. Wells Fargo N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Lucas v. PaigeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Johnson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- POWELL v. VERIZONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- WILLIAMS v. VERIZONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020