Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 19, 2005No. CIV.A.02-1816(JMF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to me for all purposes including trial by Judge Kessler pursuant to LcvR 73.1(a). Currently pending and ready for resolution are three motions: 1) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“MSJ”), 2) Defendants’ Motion in Limine [sic] and Motion to Strike Unemployment Compensation Decision (“Defs.MIL”), and 3) Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine [sic] (“Plains.MIL”). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted, rendering the two other motions moot
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lowe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Lowe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Robb v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025