Legal Opinion
Mantooth v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided September 30, 2008No. 06-07-00094-CRPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice CARTER.
Curtis Mantooth, Jr., appeals his conviction for failure to comply with sex-offender registration requirements. In 1991, Man-tooth was convicted of attempted sexual assault of a child. As discussed below, Mantooth was subject to the lifetime duty to register under Article 62.101(a). See Tex.Code CRIM. Proo. Ann. art. 62.101(a) (Vernon 2006). On or about September 18, 2006, Mantooth failed to report a change in employment within seven days and failed to report his change of residence within seven days.
The State originally indicted Mantooth under former Article…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Lancon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
- Shawn Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
- Clinton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
- Simpkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- Ajak Malual Gwath v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2022
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.