Legal Opinion

Clinton v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided November 17, 2010No. 06-10-00090-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

Katherine Clinton admits that she attempted to purchase cigarettes with the debit card of another person. Her resulting conviction for credit or debit card abuse was based on an indictment charging that Clinton “used” the debit card but omitting any allegation that she “presented” the card. Clinton’s appeal of her conviction centers on that wording of the indictment. Clinton argues that, because the State proved only that she “presented” the debit card, the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support a conclusion that she “used” it. We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Gollihar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Swearingen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clinton, KatherineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  3. Belinda A. Zanfardino v. Hugh L. Jeffus, Jr., Marshall Turner Jeffus, and Nanalee May Jeffus Nichols, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. Clinton, KatherineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. Clinton, KatherineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API