Legal Opinion

Bayer v. Fluor Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 2010No. Civil Action 09-3107PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DALZELL, District Judge.

Susan Bayer’s claims arise out of two life insurance policies that her late husband, Herbert Bayer, had through his employer, Fluor Corporation. Susan Bayer (“Susan” or “Bayer”) was Herbert’s second wife, and his purported third wife, defendant Sinead Cooke Bayer, 1 received the benefits from these policies after he died on September 18, 2004. Susan claims that she and Herbert never divorced and that his marriage to Sinead was void, thereby making Susan the rightful beneficiary. She also asserts claims against Meaghan Bayer, Herbert’s daughter from his first…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Genon Mid-Atlantic, LLC v. Stone & Webster, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API