Legal Opinion

State v. Zavala

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2017No. CC 122847, 130820; CA A154491 (Control), A154492; SC S064072 (Control); CC 122847, 130820; CA A154491 (Control), A154492; SC S064051PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

In this case, a prosecution for child sex abuse, the trial court admitted other acts evidence over defendant’s objection and without conducting OEC 403 balancing. The Court of Appeals concluded that that failure to balance was error apparent on the record under ORAP 5.45(1), in light of this court’s decision in State v. Williams, 357 Or 1, 346 P3d 455 (2015), and exercised its discretion to correct the error. State v. Zavala, 276 Or App 612, 614, 368 P3d 831 (2016). The Court of Appeals vacated defendant’s convictions and remanded to the trial court to permit that court to conduct OEC 403…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. BaughmanOregon Supreme Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. UleryOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State v. HallamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. CaveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API