Conlon v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PHILIP R. MILLER, Judge:
This is a suit by a commissioned officer in the United States Army for additional active duty pay and variable housing allowance for the period from June 19, 1981 to date. The question presented is whether or not a commissioned officer who previously served exactly 4 years as an enlisted member of the Army is entitled to receive the rate of pay provided by 37 U.S.C. § 1009 for “Commissioned officers who have been credited with over 4 years active service as enlisted members.”
The facts alleged in the complaint are not disputed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Helvering v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Hart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stotts v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987