Legal Opinion

Imbraguglio v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 6, 1996No. 668PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATHELL, Judge.

Following the death of her husband, Ethel Imbraguglio, appellant, brought this wrongful death action against The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (A & P) and Super Fresh Food Market of Maryland, Inc. (Super Fresh) (collectively, appellees). Appellant elected to have this matter tried by a jury. Finding that the action was barred by the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act), the Circuit Court for Baltimore City granted summary judgment in favor of appellees. On appeal from that grant, appellant asks:

I. Is A & P a third party under the Workers’ Compensation Statues…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Hartford Insurance v. Manor Inn of Bethesda, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Whitehead v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Brady v. Ralph Parsons Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. ImbraguglioCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. State of Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Suburban Hospital, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API