Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Imbraguglio
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
KARWACKI, Judge.
Under Maryland Code (1991 Repl.Vol., 1996 Supp.), § 9-509 of the Labor and Employment Article, 1 colloquially dubbed the “exclusivity provisions” of Maryland’s Workers’ Compensation Act (“Workers’ Compensation Act” or “the Act”), employers are immune, save for two exceptions, from suit by their employees for work-related injuries. Injured employees’ sole recourse against their employers is ordinarily under the benefit provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act. Petitioners, the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (“A & P”) and Super Fresh Markets of Maryland, Inc.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Keitz v. National Paving & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- A.J. Decoster Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Whitehead v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- MacKall v. Zayre Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- White v. FrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- County Commissioners v. J. Roland Dashiell & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Lovelace v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Philip Electronics North America v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Board of Education v. Marks-SloanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.