Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Imbraguglio

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 28, 1997No. 33, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

Under Maryland Code (1991 Repl.Vol., 1996 Supp.), § 9-509 of the Labor and Employment Article, 1 colloquially dubbed the “exclusivity provisions” of Maryland’s Workers’ Compensation Act (“Workers’ Compensation Act” or “the Act”), employers are immune, save for two exceptions, from suit by their employees for work-related injuries. Injured employees’ sole recourse against their employers is ordinarily under the benefit provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act. Petitioners, the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (“A & P”) and Super Fresh Markets of Maryland, Inc.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Keitz v. National Paving & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. A.J. Decoster Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Whitehead v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. MacKall v. Zayre Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. White v. FrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. County Commissioners v. J. Roland Dashiell & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Lovelace v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Philip Electronics North America v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Board of Education v. Marks-SloanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API