Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. City of Greensboro

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 2011No. COA10-584PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Defendant City of Greensboro appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs Lyle Cunningham, Walter Penrod, Thomas Mellinger, and Ronald Powell by declaring that the contractual provisions under which Defendant attempted to annex Plaintiffs’ properties were unenforceable. On appeal, Defendant argues that the trial court’s decision contravened various statutory provisions governing the activities of municipal governments and that the contractual provisions upon which Defendant relies were either valid covenants that ran with the land or enforceable…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Runyon v. PaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Raintree Corp. v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Ron Medlin Construction v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawson v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Mv Realty Pbc, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2026
  3. Valle Cay Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Slocum Mountain Real Est., LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API