Legal Opinion

Seater v. Klamath Irrigation Dist.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 2024No. A178647PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

No. 814 November 14, 2024 195 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Linda A. SEATER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Defendant-Respondent. Klamath County Circuit Court 19CV34752; A178647 Dan Bunch, Judge. Argued and submitted February 2, 2024. James L. Buchal argued the cause for appellant. Also on the briefs was Murphy & Buchal LLP. Matthew J. Kalmanson argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Blake H. Fry and Hart Wagner LLP. Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, Pagán, Judge, and Mooney, Senior Judge. PAGÁN, J. Reversed and remanded. 196 Seater v. Klamath…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Matteo Brunozzi v. Cable Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Burley v. Clackamas Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Huber v. Oregon Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Bjurstrom v. Oregon LotteryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seater v. Klamath Irrigation Dist.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API