Legal Opinion
Bjurstrom v. Oregon Lottery
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 12, 2005No. 03C-10887; A124915PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Plaintiff brought this action against his employer, the Oregon Lottery (Lottery), and several of its managers, alleging violations of the Oregon Public Employee Whistle-blower Law (Whistleblower Law), ORS 659A.203 to 659A.236, and the federal Civil Rights Act, 42 USC section 1983. Plaintiff claimed that he was terminated from his position as a video support technician in retaliation for making intra-agency complaints on matters of agency policy and practice. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff appeals. Because we conclude that none of the statements in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lindsey v. Clatskanie People's Utility DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Folz v. State ex rel. Oregon Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Medina v. StateWasco County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- Reynolds v. City of EugeneDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Seater v. Klamath Irrigation Dist.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.