Legal Opinion

National Union Fire Insurance v. Burkholder

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 12, 1914PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Shenandoah county in an action of assumpsit on a fire insurance policy. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

It appears that the policy here involved was issued by the defendant comp.any on the 20th day of November, 1912, upon a certain building, payable to Emma C. Burk-holder, for $800, upon which, in the event of destruction by fire, she was entitled to recover three-fourths of the actual cash value of the building at the time of the fire. The building was destroyed, by fire on the 29th day of November, 1912, and after some months of futile effort to secure payment of the amount due under the policy this suit was brought by the beneficiary and a verdict and *944judgment obtained for $600, that being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goode & Co. v. Georgia Home InsusanceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. North British & Mercantile Insurance v. NidifferSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maynard v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Harrison v. Provident Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. Aetna Insurance v. AstonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  4. Ætna Insurance v. MoselyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. Riley v. Aetna InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API