Legal Opinion
Blom v. Barnhart
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 26, 2005No. 04-C-0912PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff David Blom seeks judicial review of the denial of his application of disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under the Social Security Act. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff has been receiving supplemental security income (“SSI”) since September 1, 2001, due to diabetes melli-tus and resulting neuropathy. (Tr. at 93.) The issue in the present case is whether plaintiff was disabled by that condition prior to December 31, 1997, the date he was last insured for DIB. 1 An Administra tive Law Judge (“ALJ”) determined that plaintiff was not disabled…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Joseph A. Zurawski v. William A. Halter, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, .Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Lorenzo Lopez, on Behalf of Roberta Lopez, Deceased v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Terry Steele v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Marlin SARCHET, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- James Young v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cross v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Masch v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- Washington v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- Beth v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007
- Baker Ex Rel. Baker v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.