Slate v. Titmus
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stephenson
The question presented in this appeal is whether a holographic writing was signed by the testator as required for a valid will by Code § 64.1-49.
In October 1987, Garland B. Slate told his nephew-in-law, Edward B. Titmus, where Titmus could find Slate’s will if anything happened to Slate. Slate died on December 25, 1987. Several days later, Titmus found a sealed envelope at the place Slate had described. On the front of the envelope, in Slate’s handwriting, was the following:
Will of Garland B. Slate
Atten: Edward B. Titmus
Within the envelope was a document, entirely in Slate’s handwriting, that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Warwick v. WarwickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- Dinning v. DinningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- Hamlet v. HamletSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- Hall v. BrigstockeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- Hall v. BrigstockeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berry v. TribleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Irving v. DivitoSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Kidd v. GunterSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Mills v. Cabell County Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2023
- Slate v. TitmusSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989