Berry v. Trible
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY Justice BARBARAMILANO KEENAN.
In this appeal, we consider whether the circuit court erred in confirming a jury verdict that a handwritten phrase and notation, made on a typewritten draft of a will containing many other handwritten entries, constituted a valid holographic will.
This issue arises out of a will contest between a niece and a sister of the decedent, Louise Trible St. Martin (Louise). Tamara Mowbray Berry (Tamara), Louise's niece, claimed that an attested document executed in 1993 (the 1993 will), which ultimately resulted in Tamara being the executor and sole beneficiary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Estate of TeubertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Gooch v. GoochSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Bell v. TimminsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- Grimes v. CrouchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Bailey v. KernsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Klundt v. KlundtFairfax County Circuit Court · 2009
- In re Estate of DoughtieRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2006
- In re Estate of McKagenFairfax County Circuit Court · 2015
- In re Will of BrownRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2012