Legal Opinion

Slate v. Titmus

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 10, 1989No. Record 881365Published

1Opinion of the Court

385 S.E.2d 590 (1989)

Pelham G. SLATE, et al.

v.

Edward B. TITMUS.

Record No. 881365.

Supreme Court of Virginia.

November 10, 1989.

Frank M. Slayton (Vaughan & Slayton, South Boston, on brief), for appellants.

Lesley I.B. Schless, Richmond, (J. David Meade, Jr., Petersburg, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, on brief), for appellee.

Present CARRICO, C.J., and COMPTON, STEPHENSON, RUSSELL, THOMAS,[*] WHITING and LACY, JJ.

STEPHENSON, Justice.

The question presented in this appeal is whether a holographic writing was signed by the testator as required for a valid will by Code § 64.1-49.

In October…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Warwick v. WarwickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
  2. Dinning v. DinningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  3. Hamlet v. HamletSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  4. Hall v. BrigstockeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  5. Hall v. BrigstockeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API