Bumbarger v. Walker
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Wright, J.:
The question here involved is one which materially affects property rights in this Commonwealth. A spring depends for its water supply upon percolations beneath the surface of the ground, and the owner of adjoining land employs explosives in the lawful use of his property for mining purposes. It is my view that, in holding the adjoining owner liable for a change in the quality of the water supply, the majority is extending the doctrine of tort liability to an unwarranted extent.
It is important to bear in mind (1) that the damage claimed by these plaintiffs was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federoff Et Ux. v. Harrison Const. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Collins v. Chartiers V. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Rothrauff Et Ux. v. Sinking Spr. W. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Haldeman v. BruckhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
- Laventhol v. A. DiSandro Contracting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.